Define the tool
Set its name, description, language, target age range and clinical disciplines. Keep the purpose and intended scope clear before adding assessment content.
Create your organization’s tools or choose a published one. Decide what to assess for each child and who will contribute, then collect answers and observations and review the report and next steps.
Reuse the tool across children. Keep each assessment’s answers and report separate.
Build or select a tool, then assign the assessment and the people who will complete it.
Create the child’s assessment and choose its tools, domains, participants and due date.
Name the assessment, describe its purpose, choose the relevant departments and set a due date. Review the setup before assigning it.
Select published tools together in the same assessment. Each selected tool keeps its pinned revision, so the team works from a defined assessment structure.
Select the domains and, where supported, levels relevant to the learner. The assignment scope need not include every part of every tool.
Select eligible internal specialists, include an external therapist through their Passport code or assign a parent to contribute. Access follows the learner relationship and permissions.
One person can complete the whole assessment. With multiple participants, assign one responsible rater to each domain.
Review the tools, scope and team, then save a draft or assign the assessment. The setup flags an existing active assessment rather than silently creating the same work again.
Open your assigned items, follow the scoring instructions and add observations. Check completion and saved changes before submitting.
Move through your assigned tools, domains and levels. Read each question and its instructions, then record the answer.
Choose the score defined by the item and add your observation. The record keeps the rater and assessment it belongs to.
Use domain timing and the item timer with response counts. In supported workspace sessions, ABC notes, Activity Tracker and ABC insights are available alongside assessment.
See which answers are saved, waiting to save or failed. Retry when needed.
Review unanswered items and add a completion note when submitting a domain. Pending or failed saves must be resolved before submission can proceed.
Review completion across tools, domains and raters, alongside the team and activity timeline. Completed collection does not automatically mean a clinically reviewed report.
Review each domain’s answers and add your professional interpretation. Keep report versions to see what changed, who reviewed it and when.
Review each domain’s results, then approve, request changes or reopen it. Completed answers do not mean the review is approved.
Manage observation and completion notes, set clinical priorities and add the clinical opinion. Changes that affect the report return to the appropriate review process.
Bring domain results, score visualisations and an executive summary together. Add next goals to describe the proposed follow-up; interpretation remains a professional responsibility.
View results by rater and assessment period. Interpret them using the tool’s scoring rules; different tools do not necessarily share a scale.
Authorized users finalize or reopen the report through the assessment workflow. Version history records the action, author, date and any reason, with saved snapshots to revisit.
Print the report, save it as PDF through the browser’s print dialog or download HTML where permitted. Organization exports require the relevant guardian consent and are checked and recorded.
Explore the goals, target sets and professional workflows that support the next stage of work.
Tool selection, scoring interpretation and clinical recommendations belong to qualified professionals. A place in the catalog is not a claim that a tool is standardized, norm-referenced or suitable for every learner. Follow the tool’s terms and your professional scope.
No. Assessment items organize questions and scoring. Goals define planned teaching and measurement, while target sets contain selected items used within assigned sub-goals.
Yes, when assigned as a rater. They complete their assigned portion; professional review and interpretation remain separate responsibilities.
An administration uses its pinned published revision. Editing a later draft does not silently change that revision.
No. The public page exposes catalog metadata, domain and level structure, and counts. Item content and learner responses remain outside this public view.
Choose tools, assign work and review answers and results with the team before finalizing the report.
Loading the published catalog…
Explore tools published in this page’s language, with their domains, levels and item counts. Open a tool card to learn more.
Only public catalog metadata is shown here. Assessment questions, scoring instructions, learner answers and reports are not exposed.
The assessment journey above is still available. Please try the catalog again later; an unavailable catalog does not mean there are no tools.